ADVERTISEMENT
Polls

Should the Janesville Fire Department charge residents for emergency response? The proposal includes $400 for vehicle accidents and $500 for vehicle fires.


Response Percent Votes
Yes 25% 80 votes
No 74% 238 votes
318 total votes

Return to previous page

reader COMMENTS
partarican1
Feb 20, 2010 at 9:38 a.m.
Suggest removal

This is crazy. If I can hardly afford the mandatory insurance, how am I supposed to pay the fire department if someone else causes an accident-at no fault of my own? Look to other ways to get revenue instead of pinching the people you are PAID to help, JFD. Why do we pay LOCAL TAXES if you're going to charge us extra for services rendered; services we ALREADY PAY FOR??

helge1939
Feb 20, 2010 at 6:08 a.m.
Suggest removal

There are a lot of time's the fire dept is not even need'ed. There buy wasting money

username
Feb 20, 2010 at 12:04 a.m.
Suggest removal

I thought that is what my taxes were taking care of??? So if I go the entire year and not use the fire,ambulance,police would I get a rebate on my tax bill??? I think it only fair if they charge a per use fee. How in the world with the current economics of the area our city officials continue to take more of our $$. We have a duplex that is vacant on one side. We recieved our water bill for that unit. With the meter showing zero water useage our bill was still about $49.00 in just fees and surcharges.

frogger
Feb 19, 2010 at 6:23 p.m.
Suggest removal

See crime is down article!

dkush- I agree they are looking for the 2 Mil!

dkush21
Feb 19, 2010 at 5:55 p.m.
Suggest removal

To build an ice hockey rink! That's more important! NOT!

Mouse
Feb 19, 2010 at 5:24 p.m.
Suggest removal

One way to stop people shopping in Janesville.
Starting to sound like Illinos tolls.

rstricker
Feb 19, 2010 at 10:15 a.m.
Suggest removal

Sounds like more motivation to leave the scene of an accident to me.

clegs10
Feb 19, 2010 at 7:28 a.m.
Suggest removal

Just what do we pay taxes for?

RichE95
Feb 19, 2010 at 7:20 a.m.
Suggest removal

This a a way to charge fees rather than call them what they are - taxes. If the city is having a budget problem paying for fire protection, it is time to think out of the box. Fire protection should be outsourced. The city needs to remove itself from the union contract and the long term legacy expenses involved. The situation is no different than what has been faced by private business except that a business can't invent reasons to charge customers more. The day is coming when government institutions and workers can no longer operate risk free. They can not be exempt from economic reality and common sense.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: WCLO.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email programming@wclo.com or call 608-752-7895.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT